MAPACA

Mid-Atlantic Popular &
American Culture Association

User menu

Skip to menu

You are here

“We don’t use words like that here”: Representing the Childcare Educator in Popular Television

Presenters: 
Sandra Chang-Kredl (Concordia University, Montreal)
Katherine Marie Pauls
Presentation type: 
Paper
Abstract: 

This paper examines representations of the childcare educator in popular American and Canadian television. An in-depth search for television episodes that included significant depictions of educators working in group childcare resulted in 25 episodes, representing 15 different programmes. Approximately half of the programmes are geared toward a child audience (e.g., Rugrats, Adventure Time, The Adventures of Napkin Man, Fairly Odd Parents, Full House, and Caillou), while the rest are situation comedies that target an adult or family audience (e.g., Family Guy, The Office, Last Man Standing, The Mindy Project, Malcolm in the Middle, Raising Hope, and The Simpsons).

Using semiotic and media analysis, the construction of the childcare educator across all texts will also be examined. For example, in terms of gendered representations, the majority of educators depicted are female (which accurately mirrors social reality); when the educator is a male, his gender is a prime source of humour. In terms of racialized depictions, the educators represented are primarily white, which is not representative of the childcare workforce in Canada and the U.S.

The paper will also compare these two sets of texts (child vs family/adult). Often the narratives, especially the child texts, assume a child’s perspective, so that the child is constructed in a complex and perceptive manner, while the educator, who is rarely privileged with a first-person perspective, is constructed as simple and one-dimensional. When parents are represented, they tend to veer between being at the mercy of societal forces that necessitate their competing for a coveted place in an exclusive preschool or capitulating to prison-like childcare situations as a last option.

This paper will be of interest to conference participants who are curious about representations of childhood in popular television, conflicting values around the institutionalization of childcare, and the relationship between childcare educators’ identities and popular culture.

Scheduled on: 
Friday, November 4, 9:30 am to 10:45 am

About the presenters

Sandra Chang-Kredl

Dr. Sandra Chang-Kredl (Ph.D., McGill) is an assistant professor at Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, in the Department of Education, where she teaches and conducts research in children’s popular and media culture, early childhood education, teacher identity, curriculum studies, and children’s play. She has recently published in Curriculum Inquiry, Reflective Practice, Gender and Education, Early Years, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, and Children’s Literature in Education.

Katherine Marie Pauls

Katherine Pauls is a MA student in the Department of Education at Concordia University. She is currently working on a thesis involving the investigation of classic play theories and Minecraft. She has 13 years experience working with children as a director of a daycare centre, a preschool teacher and a children’s minister.

Session information

Broadcasting and Receiving: Children’s Television and Child Viewers

Friday, November 4, 9:30 am to 10:45 am (Tango)

Questions asked by this panel examine various ideologies conveyed in children’s television programming as well as how children receive and negotiate such messages. Pregnancy, parenthood, educational authorities, and child audiences will all be scrutinized in order to better understand what programs like Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood, Doc McStuffins, Rugrats, Caillou, and Wansapanataym have to say about childhood and the power structures they negotiate.

Back to top